Continued Fallout of Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

The failure of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 10th has continued to send ripples through financial markets, raising fears of other regional banks going under and a wider economic downturn. As the Federal Reserve (a.k.a. the Fed) moves to prevent further instability, critics have begun to point fingers at various causes for the collapse. 

Based in Santa Clara, California, SVB catered to start-ups and the tech industry. According to Reuters, it was the 16th largest bank in the United States at the time of its collapse. The Wall Street Journal reported the bank’s tenuous financial situation in the days leading up to the failure. SVB invested large portions of its assets in government bonds. Bonds are generally stable, safe investments held over a longer period of time. While the Fed raised interest rates to counter inflation, the interest rates paid on bonds remained locked in, meaning they lost value. SVB announced on March 8th that it was selling bonds, and shares in the bank, to meet withdrawal demands. Confidence-shaken customers rushed to withdraw their deposits, crippling the bank and caused it to be taken over by the Fed. The Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) protects all bank deposits up to $250,000. However, in an effort to maintain stability, the FDIC announced that it would insure all deposits held by SVB customers. 

SVB’s collapse was followed by another bank failure just two days later, when Signature Bank in New York was closed by state financial regulators. Like SVB, the FDIC seized the bank’s deposits. It reached a deal with New York Community Bancorp on March 19th, which purchased $88.6 billion in deposits and $38.4 billion in loans from Signature. Meanwhile, eleven national banks (including J.P. Morgan Chase and Bank of America) coordinated with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (she/her) to save First Republic Bank, providing it with $30 million to ensure it could continue to supply customers with funds. 

In the aftermath of the twin bank failures, financial experts and politicians are attempting to diagnose its cause, and if it was inevitable. Former Massachusetts Representative Barney Frank (he/him), who served on Signature Bank’s board, attributed the bank run to “the nervousness and beyond nervousness from SVB and crypto.” He disagrees with Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA, she/her). She blames the collapses on 2018 changes to legislation that bears his name, the Dodd-Frank Act, after Congress voted to loosen regulatory restrictions on midsize banks. In a March 18th letter to the Fed, Warren blamed bank executives for taking “unnecessary risks,” while also citing “a series of failures by lawmakers and regulators.” The New York Times reported that local Fed officials had be in contact with SVB about its weaknesses since 2021.

Website | + posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Mike Johnson addressing the US House of Representatives after being elected as Speaker (Win McNammy/Getty Images/Photo courtesy of CNN)

A Recent History of the Speaker of the House

With the election of the United States’ Speaker Of The House, Representative Mike Johnson (he/him)(R-LA-4), being finalized on October 25th, it’s important to understand the recent history of the position. While they have each been contentious, the previous three speakers present a fair analysis of what to expect out of a Republican-led House.  Johnson is […]

Fulton County Case

The racketeering case against Donald Trump (he/him) in Fulton County, Georgia, is picking up, going into November. Thus far, four of Trump’s 18 indicted co-conspirators have agreed to plea deals with the state for their involvement in a swath of criminal charges related to an array of election fraud attempts in the aftermath of the […]

Democrats Call For Term Limits

Senators Cory Booker (he/him)(D-NJ), Sheldon Whitehouse (he/him)(D-RI), Richard Blumenthal (he/him)(D-CT), and Alex Padilla (he/him)(D-CA), introduced a bill designed to impose term limits for the Supreme Court. Their bill states that every two years, the President would appoint a new justice that would hear every case for eighteen years before stepping back. The justice would be […]